Lego Robotic Drivers’ Licence Program by Jenny Garlick

Dear Bloggers,

As the recipient of the 2016 Australian Primary School, Lego Robotics Teacher Award, I presented my Drivers’ Licence Program  at the Tufts University Lego Learning Symposium 2016.  The focus of the conference was exploring new STEAM (Science,Technology, Engineering, Art and Mathematics) teaching methods for K – 12 education.

untitled-3

dlp-293

 It is my hope that by sharing it with you, you will benefit in your own Lego Robotics education journey.

untitled-3

 Download all the resources for the DLP program here

DLP Book 1 – Let’s Get Moving by Jenny Garlick

DLP Book 2 Using Sensors by Jenny Garlick

DLP Book 3 – Switches, My Blocks and more by Jenny Garlick

DLP licences and plates by Jenny Garlick

To begin my name is Jenny Garlick and I began teaching primary school Lego Robotics in 2006. I have a Bachelor of Science, a post graduate Diploma of Education and 28 years of teaching experience.  For the last five years I have been teaching robotics to students aged 7 to 12 years at Gordon East Public School. This is a medium sized State Primary School with 345 students in Sydney, Australia.  I teach in a classroom setting and focus on team work, engineering and open ended problem solving.

jen-4

dlp-267

The Lego Robotics ‘Drivers’ Licence Program’ (DLP) is an innovative lego robotics program that I have developed and implemented over the past 18 months.

I modelled the program on the Australian Drivers’ licence system where drivers’ progress through a sequence of licences: Learner, Red Provisional licence, Green Provisional licence and finally a full licence.

ps-2

Here is picture of my daughter with her Red P plates. more pic-003

This picture was taken a year later and shows her newly acquired Green P plates on the car.

untitled-001

Simarly in the classroom students take about 15 hours as they progress through this graduated system to achieve their open or full Robotics Drivers’ Licence when they have achieved mastery of all the required programming skills.

 

The Problem

Whilst teaching large classes of students in Year 5 and 6 how to program their NXT robots, many students had difficulty moving from explicit, highly structured, teacher directed lessons onto student centred learning.

How could one teacher do this and cater for the large range of abilities, needs and learning styles in a class of 30 students?

How could one person provide constant feedback and support to all pupils during a class?

The solution

The solution is the DLP, a student centred self-paced unit of work that aims to teach children 9 to 12 years old how to program their NXT robots.

untitled-3-5

Why is it so remarkable?

The remarkable success of the DLP is the delivery of highly differentiated lessons in the class room environment. With a ratio of 30 students to 1 teacher each pupil receives regular assessment, feedback, mentoring and recognition for their achievements. The DLP caters to a variety of learning styles and accommodates all levels of students with a mix of highly scaffolded basic exercises ranging to opportunities for extension.

The program has a high level of versatility and adaptability and can be easily used for other robots such as EV3, WeDo, RCX or any subject matter by simply slotting different activities into the DLP framework.

In my opinion, the greatest achievement of the program has been the incredible level of student success and engagement which has been achieved. I believe this type of approach would enhance student learning at any stage in any subject matter.

untitled-2untitled-3-6

 

How exactly does it work?

The DLP consists of three stages each with a booklet that contains programming and building activities, check points, tick sheet and driving test.

untitled-3-7

untitled-3-8untitled-3-9

The children work sequentially through the three booklets. The pages are well set out, clear, uncluttered and contain big clear colourful hints for inbuilt structural supports to facilitate a higher level of learning.

There are extension exercises throughout each booklet and the students choose whether they will carry these out.   This way no one is pigeon holed into only doing advanced or regular tasks.  Pupils, carrying out the regular activities, are provided with large amounts of scaffolding and can always see the advanced work so they are aware of what they are working towards. Other students may be able to achieve the advanced work because of the confidence and support the highly visual scaffolding provides. Students may fluidly move between the two levels depending on their ability and how confident they are feeling.

untitled-2-2

This use of Peer Mentoring is pivotal to the success of the program. At the completion of each challenge there is a check point and the team demonstrate and explain their work to their mentor team or ‘marking partner’. The marking partners check the challenge, troubleshoot if necessary, encourage the other team, provide constructive feedback and sign off the activity on the marking sheet. This will happen multiple times a lesson so their support and feedback is regular and ongoing.  Children also have highly visible up to date records of their progress.  Hence the teacher can see at any time where the team is up to and know the previous tasks have been successfully completed. This transparency and accountability is essential for the success of a self-paced unit.

untitled-2-3

 

At the successful completion of each stage students sit a ‘Driving Test’. There is an advanced and regular test and the students’ choose which test they will sit. The successful teams are awarded a badge -, ‘Red Ps’, ‘Green Ps’ and ultimately their ‘Full Licence’.  These may be regular or advanced licences

untitled-2-4

untitled-2-5

The teacher marks the test and teams do not progress onto the next level until they have demonstrated mastery of the skills being tested. Additionally students receive a paper licence that provides a written summary of the programming and building skills achieved.

untitled-2-6untitled-3-11untitled-3-12

Students are required to display their plates on their robots. The robot plating, not only delights and engages the students but also ensures the teacher can visually asses what level each pair was working at (advanced or regular) and what section they are working on by just glancing around the room.

untitled-3-13 untitled-2-7untitled-2-8

I will now show sample pages from each of the three stages and outline what each focuses on. Remember you can slot into the framework your own activities.

Stage 1 ‘Let’s get moving’ includes basic Robot Movements, Sounds, Displays and Parallel Sequence Beams. You can see a sample of a page of the workbook on the screen.

untitled-2-9

Stage 2 ‘Using Sensors’ covers using sensors.

untitled-2-10

Stage 3 – ‘Switches, My Blocks and Using the View menu’.

untitled-2-11

Once the complete Licence is gained, this is a gateway to further activities.

In summary the Drivers Licence Program

Is a framework for self-paced student centred learning that can be adapted to any subject providing a high level of student engagement, motivation and success.

The lessons are highly differentiated and cater to a variety of learning styles and accommodate all levels of students with a mix of highly scaffolded basic exercises ranging to opportunities for extension.

It involves a high level of peer assessment and mentoring with a highly motivating inbuilt reward system.

 

untitled-2-12

Jenny Garlick’s Interview in the Lego Education News Jan-Feb 2016

Dear  Bloggers,

Below is a copy of the interview with Jenny Garlick in the Jan-Feb Lego Education News

 Jenny Garlick: LEGO Education Teacher Award Recipient

Jenny Garlick (Gordon East Public School, NSW) is a winner of the LEGO Education Teacher Award for 2016.

The focus of Jenny’s application was on a LEGO Robotics “Driver’s Licence Program” (DLP) that she has developed and implemented over the past 12 months.

The judges were particularly impressed by her well-thought-out and specific presentation abstract (focusing on the DLP), the quality of her support materials, and her blog (that is full of information and photos).

How long have you been a teacher?
I’ve been a teacher for 30 years, but I did have 7 years off when I had my children.

What ages and subjects do you teach?
I’m trained as a high-school teacher, and as a high-school teacher I taught science and then I also taught physics, biology, and general science. But then, after some time off, I started teaching science at a local primary school, and did that for 12 years. And now I’ve changed to Gordon East Primary, where I’ve been for four years.

Why did you originally become a teacher?
I became a teacher because it ticks a whole lot of boxes for me. I really like working with children. It sounds altruistic, but I try to make a difference. I really enjoy finding that bit that makes their eyes shine and then working on it, and building on it. I find that hugely satisfying. I enjoy being part of a team that’s not about sales, it’s just about helping kids, and everyone wants the kids to progress. And, it’s not high on the list but it’s pretty good, when you have your own kids, that the holidays fit in!

What are the most important things that you want your students to learn?
I want them to learn how to think for themselves, how to answer questions, how to problem solve, and how to find the best in themselves, and to develop that.

And from the robotics, there’s lots I want them to learn from it. I don’t know what the main thing is, but what I feel really passionate about is I want to be able to extend the top kids. I want to give them open-ended problem solving. And for the kids who find life really difficult, I want them to want to come to school because there’s a program they can do, they can do hands-on LEGO, they can do programming. There are a lot of kids that don’t fit, but with the LEGO they find a fit.

I also like to promote education of boys. I think that girls do better in the current education system than boys, and I like the fact that it provide a platform where boys can achieve.

I want them to do controlled risk-taking. Because so many kids are bubble-wrapped and don’t take many risks, and especially high-achieving children, they’re scared of failure. I want for them to do something and it fails, and be happy that it fails, because it makes them ask, “why?”. If everything works the first time, they haven’t really pushed themselves, have they? Fail fast, ask why, and move on. And a failure is not really a failure, it just means that it didn’t work. It’s a process of elimination. I like the resilience building that comes out of that.

I like the concept that we can copy everybody and, unless it’s a test, it’s a collaborative think-tank. The kids find that really amusing, and that if you can’t work out a solution, go shopping, go around the room and get someone’s ideas.

It’s really important to develop the teamwork, that everything is a team. There’s no “I”, it’s “we”. There’s the team of the two children as pairs. I like to get mentor pairs going. There’s the team within the class, and the team within the grade.

When did you get started with using LEGO in the classroom?
Back on the time of the RCX bricks, CSIRO came out to our school for an incursion, and I just thought it was really cool and got some sets. Back then I just taught each year 5 and 6 for a term, so the students had one term in year 5, and one term in term 6.

And then, after quite some time, I left that school, and was looking for part-time work, and contacted a local school that was interested in LEGO robotics. I rang them and said, “if you want to give me a job, I can run a LEGO program for you”. I then had every child from year 2 to year 6 for either an hour or an hour-and-a-quarter each week, so it was a much bigger thing than previously. I now have every child for an hour a week for the whole their school life from year 2 to year 6.

What are the greatest challenges or blockers?
The year 5 and 6 are always a composite class. I introduce them to MINDSTORMS in year 5 and 6, so every year half the class has a year more experience than the other.

How did you manage this?
I always do mentor systems. Mentoring is absolutely terrific and works really well for the first term, but I find that with having them for only an hour a week, some of the top year sixes really want to be able to move ahead. I’ve done it with mentor partners. I put two very capable students as mentors for another pair of students. Each pair works at their own rate with their partner, but they have a mentor to go to, which I found as a bit of a solution.

Every challenge I do has at least three levels. Last year, I let the students choose their levels. That came with problems, because I talked them up about challenging themselves, and putting themselves out of their comfort zone, and they all did that! And then weren’t prepared to step back. So that’s why I introduced a badge system (the “Driver’s Licence Program”), where everyone had to work through all the different levels.

How does robotics fit into the curriculum in your school?
It interlinks with Maths, Science and Technology, and a bit of English, but what the Principal got me in to do was open-ended problem-solving, resilience-building, and team work.

Is there a student you could tell me about that’s been positively affected by this approach?
There was a girl, who was a bit left-field, not clever in the traditional sense, but had the most amazing work habits and passion. I put her into my FIRST LEGO League team and she worked doggedly at that board, day in and day out. It brought her out of herself, and she just blossomed. The robotics helped her to grow into herself, and she went onto high school and won so many awards on presentation day that she couldn’t carry them all!

Do you have any tips for other people who want to get started with LEGO robotics?
I think that WeDo is a really good starting point for people doing LEGO robotics. I think a lot of people want to go into NXTs or EV3s, but for people who aren’t particularly experienced, they should start with the WeDo.

I think the WeDo is an amazing, overlooked little system that people can confidently do. As a teacher, you don’t need to know a lot, but if you know more, you can get a lot more out of it.

 

Thank you for reading

 

Mrs Garlick

 

Jenny Garlick wins the Lego Education Teacher Award and will be the Primary School Australian representative at the 2016 Lego Engineering symposium at Tufts University in Boston USA.

Mrs Jenny Garlick, Lego Robotics Teacher, at Gordon East Public School has won the first round Lego Education Teacher Award and will be the Primary School Australian representative and guest lecturer at the 2016 Lego Engineering Symposium at Tufts University in Boston USA ,June this year.

facebook dp

 

 

Please see below the announcement in the Lego Education News

LEGO Education Teacher Award

The purpose of the LEGO Education Teacher Award is to recognise innovative classroom teachers in Australia who have an interesting story to tell and provide assistance to present their work at the LEGO Engineering Symposium 2016 at Tufts University in Boston, USA.

The award is aimed at classroom teachers, both primary and secondary, who have been using LEGO Education products in innovative ways to support their students’ learning and understanding of engineering.

UPDATE: Winner announced!

Winner announced!
Jenny Garlick (Gordon East Public School, NSW) is the winner of the LEGO Education Teacher Award for 2016.

The focus of Jenny’s application was on a LEGO Robotics “Driver’s Licence Program” (DLP) that she has developed and implemented over the past 12 months.

The judges were particularly impressed by her well-thought-out and specific presentation abstract (focusing on the DLP), the quality of her support materials, and her blog (that is full of information and photos).

Jenny will receive a $3000 bursary to go towards flights and accommodation to attend the LEGO Engineering Symposium in Boston, June 2016.

Purpose
The purpose of the LEGO Education Teacher Award is to recognise innovative classroom teachers in Australia who have an interesting story to tell and provide assistance to present their work at the LEGO Engineering Symposium 2016 at Tufts University in Boston, USA.

Target group
The award is aimed at classroom teachers, both primary and secondary, who have been using LEGO Education products in innovative ways to support their students learning and understanding of engineering.

About the LEGO Engineering Symposium
The first LEGO Engineering Symposium was held at Tufts University in Boston in 2007, and provided classroom teachers with the opportunity to inspire and support each other in how to use LEGO products to foster engineering in the classroom.

Recipient benefits
The benefits for the award recipient include the opportunity to:
– Meeting with like-minded teachers from around the world and networking
– Visiting the inspirational Centre for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) at Tufts University (http://www.ceeo.tufts.edu/)
– Share innovative teaching practice
– Test new products and provide feedback directly to LEGO Education.

Recipient expectations
The award recipient will be expected to give a 7-min TED-style presentation at the Symposium and may be invited to help run workshops around their area of expertise in Australia.

Material from presentations and workshops will subsequently be shared via the LEGOengineering.com and LEGOeducation.com.au websites.

Application process

The process for applying for a LEGO Education Teacher Award is intended to be straightforward. Applicants are required to submit the standard application form, including:
– An abstract of the proposed Symposium presentation
– Lesson materials and/or resources, e.g. a sample worksheet or lesson plan
– Evidence of implementation, e.g. a photo or sample of student work
– Evidence of contribution to the teaching community
– A brief self-evaluation and/or reflection.

 

Please see the interview in the Term 1 edition of the Lego Education News